Los

2013

Fermo GhisoniAdonisOil on canvas (relined). 170 x 115 cm.CertificateProf. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco,

In Fine Art

Diese Auktion ist eine LIVE Auktion! Sie müssen für diese Auktion registriert und als Bieter freigeschaltet sein, um bieten zu können.
Sie wurden überboten. Um die größte Chance zu haben zu gewinnen, erhöhen Sie bitte Ihr Maximal Gebot.
Ihre Registrierung wurde noch nicht durch das Auktionshaus genehmigt. Bitte, prüfen Sie Ihr E-Mail Konto für mehr Details.
Leider wurde Ihre Registrierung durch das Auktionshaus abgelehnt. Sie können das Auktionshaus direkt kontaktieren über +49 (0)221 9257290 um mehr Informationen zu erhalten.
Sie sind zurzeit Höchstbieter! Um sicher zustellen, dass Sie das Los ersteigern, melden Sie sich zum Live Bieten an unter , oder erhöhen Sie ihr Maximalgebot.
Geben Sie jetzt ein Gebot ab! Ihre Registrierung war erfolgreich.
Entschuldigung, die Gebotsabgabephase ist leider beendet. Es erscheinen täglich 1000 neue Lose auf lot-tissimo.com, bitte starten Sie eine neue Anfrage.
Das Bieten auf dieser Auktion hat noch nicht begonnen. Bitte, registrieren Sie sich jetzt, so dass Sie zugelassen werden bis die Auktion startet.
Fermo GhisoniAdonisOil on canvas (relined). 170 x 115 cm.CertificateProf. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco,
Das Auktionshaus hat für dieses Los keine Ergebnisse veröffentlicht
Köln

Fermo Ghisoni
Adonis

Öl auf Leinwand (doubliert). 170 x 115 cm.

Gutachten
Prof. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco, Bazzano 9.1.2018.

Provenienz
Italienischer Privatbesitz.

Am 20. Oktober 1545 berichtet Kardinal Ercole Gonzaga in einem Schreiben an den Gelehrten Paolo Giovio, dass der Mantuaner Hofkünstler Fermo Ghisoni in Rom weile. Ercole Gonzaga war nicht irgendwer; er war Bischof von Mantua, als Onkel des unmündigen Francesco führte er die Regierungsgeschäfte des Herzogtums Mantua. Bekanntlich zählte der Mantuaner Hof zu den prächtigsten und kunstsinnigsten in Italien, Künstler wie Andrea Mantegna, Giulio Romano, Domenico Fetti und Peter Paul Rubens waren dort als Hofkünstler tätig. Der Brief verdeutlicht, wie zwischen Höfen und Kunstzentren Informationen über Künstler und Kunstwerke ausgetauscht wurden. Er ist in unserem Fall von Interesse, weil er Rückschlüsse auf die Entstehungsgeschichte und die Datierung des vorliegenden Gemäldes erlaubt, den Adonis des Fermo Ghisoni.
Das Gemälde zeigt, fast in Lebensgröße, einen nackten Jüngling, der in elegantem Kontrapost steht und den Betrachter anblickt. Er hält mit der Linken einen Speer, den rechten Arm hat er in die Hüfte gestemmt. Er ist unbekleidet, nur ein dünner Umhang bedeckt den Oberkörper und den linken Unterarm. Der Stoff des Mantels flattert wie von einem sanften Windstoß bewegt und umspielt den auf einen Felsstück aufgestützten Arm. An der Seite des Jünglings sieht man einen Jagdhund, der treu zu ihm emporblickt.
Wir wissen heute nicht mehr, wer der Auftraggeber dieses Gemäldes war. Wir können jedoch davon ausgehen, dass dieser Auftraggeber, wie jeder andere kunstsinnige Betrachter jener Zeit, in dem männlichen Akt unmittelbar die Referenz zu einer berühmten antiken Statue gesehen hat, den Adonis, der sich damals in der Sammlung des päpstlichen Leibarztes Franceso Fusconi befand (vgl. Abb. 1). Die Statue war zuvor in Rom entdeckt worden und galt - auch noch in späteren Jahrhunderten - als eine der schönsten Antiken Roms. Fermo Ghisoni muss sie während seines Romaufenthaltes 1545 in der Sammlung Fusconis gesehen haben. Vergleicht man das vorliegende Gemälde mit der antiken Statue, wird deutlich, dass sich Ghisoni im Wesentlichen an die Vorlage hielt, wobei er die fehlende linke Hand ergänzte und den Kopf des Ebers fortließ. Lucco datiert das Gemälde in das Jahr 1546 und damit kurz nach der Rückkehr des Künstlers aus Rom. Er geht zudem davon aus, dass es sich bei der Darstellung tatsächlich um den schönen jungen Adonis handelt, von dessen tragischem Ende die antike Mythologie erzählt. Dies ist erwähnenswert, denn bereits zu jener Zeit gab es eine gelehrte Debatte, ob die antike Statue Adonis oder Meleager darstelle. Während zunächst Adonis favorisiert wurde (auch vom damaligen Eigentümer), setzte sich später Meleager durch; als Meleager Pighini, benannt nach einem späteren Eigentümer, ist die Statue heute bekannt (vgl. Francis Haskell u. Nicholas Penny: Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900. London 1981, S. 263-265).
Ein Gemälde, das derart auf eine berühmte antike Statue in Rom rekurriert, muss in Mantua Gefallen gefunden haben, besaß der herzogliche Hof doch eine eigene ansehnliche Antikensammlung. Einer der späteren Mantuaner Herzöge sollte - vergeblich - versuchen, den Meleager Pighini zu erwerben. Die vorliegende Darstellung des Adonis stellt eines der seltenen identifizierten Werke Fermo Ghisonis dar, der zu den Künstlern im Umkreis Giulio Romanos zählte, die an der malerischen Ausstattung des Palazzo del Tè mitwirkten, dem manieristischen Gesamtkunstwerk par excellence.

Abb. 1/Ill. 1: Meleager Pighini, Rom/ Rome, Musei Vaticani © bpk



Fermo Ghisoni
Adonis

Oil on canvas (relined). 170 x 115 cm.

Certificate
Prof. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco, Bazzano 09.01.2018.

Provenance
Italian private ownership.

On 20th October 1545, Cardianal Ercole Gonzaga mentioned in a letter to the scholar Paolo Giovio that the Mantuan court painter Fermo Ghisoni was staying in Rome. Ercole Gonzaga was not just anyone; he was the Bishop of Mantua and as uncle of the still underage Francesco he also ran the duchy's government. The court of Mantua was known as one of the most opulent and cultured in all of Italy, attracting artists such as Andrea Mantegna, Giulio Romano, Domenico Fetti and Peter Paul Rubens. The letter demonstrates how information about artists and art works was shared between courts and artistic centres, and in this case it is particularly interesting as it allows us to draw conclusions about the genesis and history of this work, Fermo Ghisoni's Adonis.
The painting depicts a nude youth standing almost life sized in elegant contrapposto and looking out towards the beholder. He holds a spear in his left hand and his right hand is placed upon his hip. He is unclothed save for a thin cloak covering his upper body and left forearm. The fabric of the cloak flutters as if moved by a gentle breeze, playing about the arm which rests upon the stone beside the figure. A hunting dog by the youth's side looks up towards him with a faithful gaze.
We do not know who commissioned this painting. However, we can assume that the work's patron, like any other connoisseur of the time, would have recognised the parallels between this male nude and the famous ancient statue of Adonis then housed in the collection of the Pope's physician Franceso Fusconi. The work was found in Rome and was considered for many centuries to be one of the finest ancient Roman sculptures ever discovered. Fermo Ghisoni must have seen the statue in Fusconi's collection during his stay in Rome in 1545. Comparing this work to the ancient sculpture, one notices that Ghisoni has remained quite close to the model, but has reconstructed the missing left hand and left out the boar's head. Lucco dates the painting to the year 1546, shortly after the artist's return from Rome. He also assumes that the work is intended to depict the beautiful young Adonis, whose tragic end is recorded in ancient myth. This is particularly interesting since at the time this work was painted, scholars were still debating whether the statue depicted Adonis or Meleager. Whilst Adonis was favoured initially (including the work's owner), it was later generally agreed that the work depicted Meleager and it came to be known up until the present day as the Meleager Pighini after its later owner (cf. Francis Haskell & Nicholas Penny: Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900. London 1981, p. 263-265).
A painting reiterating such a famous Roman sculpture must have found favour in Mantua, since the ducal court was in possession of its own considerable collection of antiquities. One of the later Dukes of Mantua was to attempt without success to acquire the Meleager Pighini for his own collection. This depiction of Adonis is one of just a few rare works able to be securely attributed to Fermo Ghisoni, an artist from the circle of Giulio Romano who also helped with the painted decoration of the Palazzo del Tè, one of the great masterpieces of Mannerism.

Fermo Ghisoni
Adonis

Öl auf Leinwand (doubliert). 170 x 115 cm.

Gutachten
Prof. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco, Bazzano 9.1.2018.

Provenienz
Italienischer Privatbesitz.

Am 20. Oktober 1545 berichtet Kardinal Ercole Gonzaga in einem Schreiben an den Gelehrten Paolo Giovio, dass der Mantuaner Hofkünstler Fermo Ghisoni in Rom weile. Ercole Gonzaga war nicht irgendwer; er war Bischof von Mantua, als Onkel des unmündigen Francesco führte er die Regierungsgeschäfte des Herzogtums Mantua. Bekanntlich zählte der Mantuaner Hof zu den prächtigsten und kunstsinnigsten in Italien, Künstler wie Andrea Mantegna, Giulio Romano, Domenico Fetti und Peter Paul Rubens waren dort als Hofkünstler tätig. Der Brief verdeutlicht, wie zwischen Höfen und Kunstzentren Informationen über Künstler und Kunstwerke ausgetauscht wurden. Er ist in unserem Fall von Interesse, weil er Rückschlüsse auf die Entstehungsgeschichte und die Datierung des vorliegenden Gemäldes erlaubt, den Adonis des Fermo Ghisoni.
Das Gemälde zeigt, fast in Lebensgröße, einen nackten Jüngling, der in elegantem Kontrapost steht und den Betrachter anblickt. Er hält mit der Linken einen Speer, den rechten Arm hat er in die Hüfte gestemmt. Er ist unbekleidet, nur ein dünner Umhang bedeckt den Oberkörper und den linken Unterarm. Der Stoff des Mantels flattert wie von einem sanften Windstoß bewegt und umspielt den auf einen Felsstück aufgestützten Arm. An der Seite des Jünglings sieht man einen Jagdhund, der treu zu ihm emporblickt.
Wir wissen heute nicht mehr, wer der Auftraggeber dieses Gemäldes war. Wir können jedoch davon ausgehen, dass dieser Auftraggeber, wie jeder andere kunstsinnige Betrachter jener Zeit, in dem männlichen Akt unmittelbar die Referenz zu einer berühmten antiken Statue gesehen hat, den Adonis, der sich damals in der Sammlung des päpstlichen Leibarztes Franceso Fusconi befand (vgl. Abb. 1). Die Statue war zuvor in Rom entdeckt worden und galt - auch noch in späteren Jahrhunderten - als eine der schönsten Antiken Roms. Fermo Ghisoni muss sie während seines Romaufenthaltes 1545 in der Sammlung Fusconis gesehen haben. Vergleicht man das vorliegende Gemälde mit der antiken Statue, wird deutlich, dass sich Ghisoni im Wesentlichen an die Vorlage hielt, wobei er die fehlende linke Hand ergänzte und den Kopf des Ebers fortließ. Lucco datiert das Gemälde in das Jahr 1546 und damit kurz nach der Rückkehr des Künstlers aus Rom. Er geht zudem davon aus, dass es sich bei der Darstellung tatsächlich um den schönen jungen Adonis handelt, von dessen tragischem Ende die antike Mythologie erzählt. Dies ist erwähnenswert, denn bereits zu jener Zeit gab es eine gelehrte Debatte, ob die antike Statue Adonis oder Meleager darstelle. Während zunächst Adonis favorisiert wurde (auch vom damaligen Eigentümer), setzte sich später Meleager durch; als Meleager Pighini, benannt nach einem späteren Eigentümer, ist die Statue heute bekannt (vgl. Francis Haskell u. Nicholas Penny: Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900. London 1981, S. 263-265).
Ein Gemälde, das derart auf eine berühmte antike Statue in Rom rekurriert, muss in Mantua Gefallen gefunden haben, besaß der herzogliche Hof doch eine eigene ansehnliche Antikensammlung. Einer der späteren Mantuaner Herzöge sollte - vergeblich - versuchen, den Meleager Pighini zu erwerben. Die vorliegende Darstellung des Adonis stellt eines der seltenen identifizierten Werke Fermo Ghisonis dar, der zu den Künstlern im Umkreis Giulio Romanos zählte, die an der malerischen Ausstattung des Palazzo del Tè mitwirkten, dem manieristischen Gesamtkunstwerk par excellence.

Abb. 1/Ill. 1: Meleager Pighini, Rom/ Rome, Musei Vaticani © bpk



Fermo Ghisoni
Adonis

Oil on canvas (relined). 170 x 115 cm.

Certificate
Prof. Dr. Mauro Umberto Lucco, Bazzano 09.01.2018.

Provenance
Italian private ownership.

On 20th October 1545, Cardianal Ercole Gonzaga mentioned in a letter to the scholar Paolo Giovio that the Mantuan court painter Fermo Ghisoni was staying in Rome. Ercole Gonzaga was not just anyone; he was the Bishop of Mantua and as uncle of the still underage Francesco he also ran the duchy's government. The court of Mantua was known as one of the most opulent and cultured in all of Italy, attracting artists such as Andrea Mantegna, Giulio Romano, Domenico Fetti and Peter Paul Rubens. The letter demonstrates how information about artists and art works was shared between courts and artistic centres, and in this case it is particularly interesting as it allows us to draw conclusions about the genesis and history of this work, Fermo Ghisoni's Adonis.
The painting depicts a nude youth standing almost life sized in elegant contrapposto and looking out towards the beholder. He holds a spear in his left hand and his right hand is placed upon his hip. He is unclothed save for a thin cloak covering his upper body and left forearm. The fabric of the cloak flutters as if moved by a gentle breeze, playing about the arm which rests upon the stone beside the figure. A hunting dog by the youth's side looks up towards him with a faithful gaze.
We do not know who commissioned this painting. However, we can assume that the work's patron, like any other connoisseur of the time, would have recognised the parallels between this male nude and the famous ancient statue of Adonis then housed in the collection of the Pope's physician Franceso Fusconi. The work was found in Rome and was considered for many centuries to be one of the finest ancient Roman sculptures ever discovered. Fermo Ghisoni must have seen the statue in Fusconi's collection during his stay in Rome in 1545. Comparing this work to the ancient sculpture, one notices that Ghisoni has remained quite close to the model, but has reconstructed the missing left hand and left out the boar's head. Lucco dates the painting to the year 1546, shortly after the artist's return from Rome. He also assumes that the work is intended to depict the beautiful young Adonis, whose tragic end is recorded in ancient myth. This is particularly interesting since at the time this work was painted, scholars were still debating whether the statue depicted Adonis or Meleager. Whilst Adonis was favoured initially (including the work's owner), it was later generally agreed that the work depicted Meleager and it came to be known up until the present day as the Meleager Pighini after its later owner (cf. Francis Haskell & Nicholas Penny: Taste and the Antique. The Lure of Classical Sculpture 1500-1900. London 1981, p. 263-265).
A painting reiterating such a famous Roman sculpture must have found favour in Mantua, since the ducal court was in possession of its own considerable collection of antiquities. One of the later Dukes of Mantua was to attempt without success to acquire the Meleager Pighini for his own collection. This depiction of Adonis is one of just a few rare works able to be securely attributed to Fermo Ghisoni, an artist from the circle of Giulio Romano who also helped with the painted decoration of the Palazzo del Tè, one of the great masterpieces of Mannerism.

Fine Art

Auktionsdatum
Ort der Versteigerung
Neumarkt 3
Köln
50667
Germany

Für Kunsthaus Lempertz Versandinformtation bitte wählen Sie +49 (0)221 9257290.

Wichtige Informationen

Nothing important.

AGB

standard | standard



Conditions of Sale

1. The art auction house, Kunsthaus Lempertz KG (henceforth referred to as Lempertz), conducts public auctions in terms of § 383 paragraph 3 sentence 1 of the Civil Code as commissioning agent on behalf of the accounts of submitters, who remain anonymous. With regard to its auctioneering terms and conditions drawn up in other languages, the German version remains the official one.

2. The auctioneer reserves the right to divide or combine any catalogue lots or, if it has special reason to do so, to offer any lot for sale in an order different from that given in the catalogue or to withdraw any lot from the sale.

3. All lots put up for sale may be viewed and inspected prior to the auction. The catalogue specifications and related specifications appearing on the internet, which have both been compiled in good conscience, do not form part of the contractually agreed to conditions. These specifications have been derived from the status of the information available at the time of compiling the catalogue. They do not serve as a guarantee in legal terms and their purpose is purely in the information they provide. The same applies to any reports on an item’s condition or any other information, either in oral or written form. Certificates or certifications from artists, their estates or experts relevant to each case only form a contractual part of the agreement if they are specifically mentioned in the catalogue text. The state of the item is generally not mentioned in the catalogue. Likewise missing specifications do not constitute an agreement on quality. All items are used goods.

4. Warranty claims are excluded. In the event of variances from the catalogue descriptions, which result in negation or substantial diminution of value or suitability, and which are reported with due justification within one year after handover, Lempertz nevertheless undertakes to pursue its rights against the seller through the courts; in the event of a successful claim against the seller, Lempertz will reimburse the buyer only the total purchase price paid. Over and above this, Lempertz undertakes to reimburse its commission within a given period of three years after the date of the sale if the object in question proves not to be authentic.

5. Claims for compensation as the result of a fault or defect in the object auctioned or damage to it or its loss, regardless of the legal grounds, or as the result of variances from the catalogue description or statements made elsewhere are excluded unless Lempertz acted with wilful intent or gross negligence; the liability for bodily injury or damages caused to health or life remains unaffected. In other regards, point 4 applies.

6. Submission of bids. Bids in attendance: The floor bidder receives a bidding number on presentation of a photo ID. Lempertz reserves the right to grant entry to the auction. If the bidder is not known to Lempertz, registration must take place 24 hours before the auction is due to begin in writing on presentation of a current bank reference. Bids in absentia: Bids can also be submitted either in writing, telephonically or via the internet. The placing of bids in absentia must reach Lempertz 24 hours before the auction to ensure the proper processing thereof. The item must be mentioned in the bid placed, together with the lot number and item description. In the event of ambiguities, the listed lot number becomes applicable. The placement of a bid must be signed by the applicant. The regulations regarding revocations and the right to return the goods in the case of long distance agreements (§ 312b-d of the Civil Code) do not apply. Telephone bids: Establishing and maintaining a connection cannot be vouched for. In submitting a bid placement, the bidder declares that he agrees to the recording of the bidding process. Bids via the internet: They will only be accepted by Lempertz if the bidder registered himself on the internet website beforehand. Lempertz will treat such bids in the same way as bids in writing.

7. Carrying out the auction: The hammer will come down when no higher bids are submitted after three calls for a bid. In extenuating circumstances, the auctioneer reserves the right to bring down the hammer or he can refuse to accept a bid. If several individuals make the same bid at the same time, and after the third call, no higher bid ensues, then the ticket becomes the deciding factor. The auctioneer can retract his acceptance of the bid and auction the item once more if a higher bid that was submitted on time, was erroneously overlooked and immediately queried by the bidder, or if any doubts regarding its acceptance arise. Written bids are only played to an absolute maximum by Lempertz if this is deemed necessary to outbid
another bid. The auctioneer can bid on behalf of the submitter up to the agreed limit, without revealing this and irrespective of whether other bids are submitted. Even if bids have been placed and the hammer has not come down, the auctioneer is only liable to the bidder in the event of premeditation or gross negligence.

8. Once a lot has been knocked down, the successful bidder is obliged to buy it. If a bid is accepted conditionally, the bidder is bound by his bid until four weeks after the auction unless he immediately withdraws from the conditionally accepted bid. From the fall of the hammer, possession and risk pass directly to the buyer, while ownership passes to the buyer only after full payment has been received.

9. Up to a hammer price of € 400,000 a premium of 24 % calculated on the hammer price plus 19 % value added tax (VAT) calculated on the premium only is levied. The premium will be reduced to 20 % (plus VAT) on any amount surpassing € 400,000 (margin scheme). On lots which are characterized by N, an additional 7 % for import tax will be charged. On lots which are characterized by an D, 35% is calculated on the hammer price (24% buyer´s premium + 19% VAT on the premium only + import tax). 31% is calculated on the amount surpassing € 400.000. The D objects contain all taxes, and tehy can not be carried away immediately. On lots which are characterized by an R, the buyer shall pay a premium of 24 % on the hammer price up to € 400,000 and 20 % on the surpassing amount; onto this (hammer price and premium) the statutory VAT of 19 % will be added (regular scheme). Exports to third (i.e. non-EU) countries will be exempt from VAT, and so will be exports made by companies from other EU member states if they state their VAT identification number. For original works of art, whose authors are either still alive or died after 31.12.1948, a charge of 1.8 % on the hammer price will be levied for the droit de suite. The maximum charge is € 12,500. If a buyer exports an object to a third country personally, the VAT will be refunded, as soon as Lempertz receives the export and import papers. All invoices issued on the day of auction or soon after remain under provision.

10. Successful bidders attending the auction in person shall forthwith upon the purchase pay to Lempertz the final price (hammer price plus premium and VAT) in Euro. Payments by foreign buyers who have bid in writing or by proxy shall also be due forthwith upon the purchase, but will not be deemed to have been delayed if received within ten days of the invoice date. Bank transfers are to be exclusively in Euros. The request for an alteration of an auction invoice to a person other than the bidder has to be made immediately after the auction. Lempertz however reserves the right to refuse such a request if it is deemed appropriate.

11. In the case of payment default, Lempertz will charge 1% interest on the outstanding amount of the gross price per month.. If the buyer defaults in payment, Lempertz may at its discretion insist on performance of the purchase contract or, after allowing a period of grace, claim damages for non-performance. In the latter case, Lempertz may determine the amount of the damages by putting the lot or lots up for auction again, in which case the defaulting buyer will bear the amount of any reduction in the proceeds compared with the earlier auction, plus the cost of resale, including the premium.

12. Buyers must take charge of their purchases immediately after the auction. Once a lot has been sold, the auctioneer is liable only for wilful intent or gross negligence. Lots will not, however, be surrendered to buyers until full payment has been received. Without exception, shipment will be at the expense and risk of the buyer. Purchases which are not collected within four weeks after the auction may be stored and insured by Lempertz on behalf of the buyer and at its expense in the premises of a freight agent. If Lempertz stores such items itself, it will charge 1 % of the hammer price for insurance and storage costs.

13. As far as this can be agreed, the place of performance and jurisdiction is Cologne. German law applies; the German law for the protection of cultural goods applies; the provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) are not applicable. Should any provision herein be wholly or partially ineffective, this will not affect the validity of the remaining provisions.

Henrik Hanstein, sworn public auctioneer
Takuro Ito, Kilian Jay von Seldeneck, auctioneers

Vollständige AGBs